4 different ways to predict survival on Titanic - part 4

4 different ways to predict survival on Titanic – part 4

Posted on Posted in Data Analysis Resources, Kaggle

continued from part 3

4. Way to predict survival on Titianic

These notes are taken from this link

In [2]:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
%matplotlib inline
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import statsmodels.api as sm
from statsmodels.nonparametric.kde import KDEUnivariate
from statsmodels.nonparametric import smoothers_lowess
from pandas import Series, DataFrame
from patsy import dmatrices
from sklearn import datasets, svm
In [3]:
#Not working at the moment
import sys
#from KaggleAux import predict as ka # see github.com/agconti/kaggleaux for more details

Data Handling

In [4]:
df = pd.read_csv(r"C:\Users\piush\Desktop\Dataset\Titanic\train.csv")
In [5]:
#Take care of missing values:
df = df.drop(['Ticket','Cabin'], axis=1) 
# Remove NaN values
df = df.dropna() 

Link to learn pandas

Let’s take a Look at our data graphically:

In [6]:
# specifies the parameters of our graphs
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(18,6), dpi=1600) 
alpha=alpha_scatterplot = 0.2 
alpha_bar_chart = 0.55

# lets us plot many diffrent shaped graphs together 
ax1 = plt.subplot2grid((2,3),(0,0))
# plots a bar graph of those who surived vs those who did not.               
df.Survived.value_counts().plot(kind='bar', alpha=alpha_bar_chart)
# this nicely sets the margins in matplotlib to deal with a recent bug 1.3.1
ax1.set_xlim(-1, 2)
# puts a title on our graph
plt.title("Distribution of Survival, (1 = Survived)")    

plt.scatter(df.Survived, df.Age, alpha=alpha_scatterplot)
# sets the y axis lable
# formats the grid line style of our graphs                          
plt.grid(b=True, which='major', axis='y')  
plt.title("Survival by Age,  (1 = Survived)")

ax3 = plt.subplot2grid((2,3),(0,2))
df.Pclass.value_counts().plot(kind="barh", alpha=alpha_bar_chart)
ax3.set_ylim(-1, len(df.Pclass.value_counts()))
plt.title("Class Distribution")

plt.subplot2grid((2,3),(1,0), colspan=2)
# plots a kernel density estimate of the subset of the 1st class passangers's age
df.Age[df.Pclass == 1].plot(kind='kde')    
df.Age[df.Pclass == 2].plot(kind='kde')
df.Age[df.Pclass == 3].plot(kind='kde')
 # plots an axis lable
plt.title("Age Distribution within classes")
# sets our legend for our graph.
plt.legend(('1st Class', '2nd Class','3rd Class'),loc='best') 

ax5 = plt.subplot2grid((2,3),(1,2))
df.Embarked.value_counts().plot(kind='bar', alpha=alpha_bar_chart)
ax5.set_xlim(-1, len(df.Embarked.value_counts()))
# specifies the parameters of our graphs
plt.title("Passengers per boarding location")
<matplotlib.text.Text at 0x26b5fdbb748>

Exploratory Visualization:

In [7]:
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
df.Survived.value_counts().plot(kind='barh', color="blue", alpha=.65)
ax.set_ylim(-1, len(df.Survived.value_counts())) 
plt.title("Survival Breakdown (1 = Survived, 0 = Died)")
<matplotlib.text.Text at 0x26b00020e48>
<matplotlib.figure.Figure at 0x26b5a504908>
In [8]:
#Let’s break the previous graph down by gender
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(18,6))

#create a plot of two subsets, male and female, of the survived variable.
#After we do that we call value_counts() so it can be easily plotted as a bar graph. 
#'barh' is just a horizontal bar graph
df_male = df.Survived[df.Sex == 'male'].value_counts().sort_index()
df_female = df.Survived[df.Sex == 'female'].value_counts().sort_index()

ax1 = fig.add_subplot(121)
df_male.plot(kind='barh',label='Male', alpha=0.55)
df_female.plot(kind='barh', color='#FA2379',label='Female', alpha=0.55)
plt.title("Who Survived? with respect to Gender, (raw value counts) "); plt.legend(loc='best')
ax1.set_ylim(-1, 2) 

#adjust graph to display the proportions of survival by gender
ax2 = fig.add_subplot(122)
(df_male/float(df_male.sum())).plot(kind='barh',label='Male', alpha=0.55)  
(df_female/float(df_female.sum())).plot(kind='barh', color='#FA2379',label='Female', alpha=0.55)
plt.title("Who Survived proportionally? with respect to Gender"); plt.legend(loc='best')

ax2.set_ylim(-1, 2)
(-1, 2)

Can we capture more of the structure by using Pclass? Here we will bucket classes as lowest class or any of the high classes (classes 1 – 2). 3 is lowest class. Let’s break it down by Gender and what Class they were traveling in.

In [9]:
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(18,4), dpi=1600)
alpha_level = 0.65

# building on the previous code, here we create an additional subset with in the gender subset 
# we created for the survived variable. I know, thats a lot of subsets. After we do that we call 
# value_counts() so it it can be easily plotted as a bar graph. this is repeated for each gender 
# class pair.
female_highclass = df.Survived[df.Sex == 'female'][df.Pclass != 3].value_counts()
female_highclass.plot(kind='bar', label='female, highclass', color='#FA2479', alpha=alpha_level)
ax1.set_xticklabels(["Survived", "Died"], rotation=0)
ax1.set_xlim(-1, len(female_highclass))
plt.title("Who Survived? with respect to Gender and Class"); plt.legend(loc='best')

ax2=fig.add_subplot(142, sharey=ax1)
female_lowclass = df.Survived[df.Sex == 'female'][df.Pclass == 3].value_counts()
female_lowclass.plot(kind='bar', label='female, low class', color='pink', alpha=alpha_level)
ax2.set_xticklabels(["Died","Survived"], rotation=0)
ax2.set_xlim(-1, len(female_lowclass))

ax3=fig.add_subplot(143, sharey=ax1)
male_lowclass = df.Survived[df.Sex == 'male'][df.Pclass == 3].value_counts()
male_lowclass.plot(kind='bar', label='male, low class',color='lightblue', alpha=alpha_level)
ax3.set_xticklabels(["Died","Survived"], rotation=0)
ax3.set_xlim(-1, len(male_lowclass))

ax4=fig.add_subplot(144, sharey=ax1)
male_highclass = df.Survived[df.Sex == 'male'][df.Pclass != 3].value_counts()
male_highclass.plot(kind='bar', label='male, highclass', alpha=alpha_level, color='steelblue')
ax4.set_xticklabels(["Died","Survived"], rotation=0)
ax4.set_xlim(-1, len(male_highclass))
<matplotlib.legend.Legend at 0x26b00544320>

Supervised Machine Learning

First, we define our formula for our Logit regression. In the next cell we create a regression friendly dataframe that sets up boolean values for the categorical variables in our formula and lets our regression model know the types of inputs we’re giving it. The model is then instantiated and fitted before a summary of the model’s performance is printed. In the last cell we graphically compare the predictions of our model to the actual values we are trying to predict, as well as the residual errors from our model to check for any structure we may have missed.

In [11]:
# model formula
# here the ~ sign is an = sign, and the features of our dataset
# are written as a formula to predict survived. The C() lets our 
# regression know that those variables are categorical.
# Ref: http://patsy.readthedocs.org/en/latest/formulas.html
formula = 'Survived ~ C(Pclass) + C(Sex) + Age + SibSp  + C(Embarked)' 
# create a results dictionary to hold our regression results for easy analysis later        
results = {} 
In [12]:
# create a regression friendly dataframe using patsy's dmatrices function
y,x = dmatrices(formula, data=df, return_type='dataframe')

# instantiate our model
model = sm.Logit(y,x)

# fit our model to the training data
res = model.fit()

# save the result for outputing predictions later
results['Logit'] = [res, formula]
Optimization terminated successfully.
         Current function value: 0.444388
         Iterations 6
Logit Regression Results
Dep. Variable: Survived No. Observations: 712
Model: Logit Df Residuals: 704
Method: MLE Df Model: 7
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2016 Pseudo R-squ.: 0.3414
Time: 16:37:45 Log-Likelihood: -316.40
converged: True LL-Null: -480.45
LLR p-value: 5.992e-67
coef std err z P>|z| [95.0% Conf. Int.]
Intercept 4.5423 0.474 9.583 0.000 3.613 5.471
C(Pclass)[T.2] -1.2673 0.299 -4.245 0.000 -1.852 -0.682
C(Pclass)[T.3] -2.4966 0.296 -8.422 0.000 -3.078 -1.916
C(Sex)[T.male] -2.6239 0.218 -12.060 0.000 -3.050 -2.197
C(Embarked)[T.Q] -0.8351 0.597 -1.398 0.162 -2.006 0.335
C(Embarked)[T.S] -0.4254 0.271 -1.572 0.116 -0.956 0.105
Age -0.0436 0.008 -5.264 0.000 -0.060 -0.027
SibSp -0.3697 0.123 -3.004 0.003 -0.611 -0.129
In [13]:
# Plot Predictions Vs Actual
plt.subplot(121, axisbg="#DBDBDB")
# generate predictions from our fitted model
ypred = res.predict(x)
plt.plot(x.index, ypred, 'bo', x.index, y, 'mo', alpha=.25);
plt.grid(color='white', linestyle='dashed')
plt.title('Logit predictions, Blue: \nFitted/predicted values: Red');

# Residuals
ax2 = plt.subplot(122, axisbg="#DBDBDB")
plt.plot(res.resid_dev, 'r-')
plt.grid(color='white', linestyle='dashed')
ax2.set_xlim(-1, len(res.resid_dev))
plt.title('Logit Residuals');

How well did this work?

In [14]:
fig = plt.figure(figsize=(18,9), dpi=1600)
a = .2

# Below are examples of more advanced plotting. 
# It it looks strange check out the tutorial above.
fig.add_subplot(221, axisbg="#DBDBDB")
kde_res = KDEUnivariate(res.predict())
plt.fill_between(kde_res.support,kde_res.density, alpha=a)
plt.title("Distribution of our Predictions")

fig.add_subplot(222, axisbg="#DBDBDB")
plt.scatter(res.predict(),x['C(Sex)[T.male]'] , alpha=a)
plt.grid(b=True, which='major', axis='x')
plt.xlabel("Predicted chance of survival")
plt.ylabel("Gender Bool")
plt.title("The Change of Survival Probability by Gender (1 = Male)")

fig.add_subplot(223, axisbg="#DBDBDB")
plt.scatter(res.predict(),x['C(Pclass)[T.3]'] , alpha=a)
plt.xlabel("Predicted chance of survival")
plt.ylabel("Class Bool")
plt.grid(b=True, which='major', axis='x')
plt.title("The Change of Survival Probability by Lower Class (1 = 3rd Class)")

fig.add_subplot(224, axisbg="#DBDBDB")
plt.scatter(res.predict(),x.Age , alpha=a)
plt.grid(True, linewidth=0.15)
plt.title("The Change of Survival Probability by Age")
plt.xlabel("Predicted chance of survival")
<matplotlib.text.Text at 0x26b003945c0>
Now lets use our model to predict the test set values and then save the results so they can be outputed to Kaggle
In [15]:
test_data = pd.read_csv(r"C:\Users\piush\Desktop\Dataset\Titanic\test.csv")

Add our independent variable to our test data. (It is usually left blank by Kaggle because it is the value you are trying to predict.)

In [17]:
test_data['Survived'] = 1.23
In [18]:
#Our binned results data:
{'Logit': [<statsmodels.discrete.discrete_model.BinaryResultsWrapper at 0x26b002c6da0>,
  'Survived ~ C(Pclass) + C(Sex) + Age + SibSp  + C(Embarked)']}
In [27]:
# Use your model to make prediction on our test set. 
#compared_resuts = predict(test_data, results, 'Logit')
#compared_resuts = Series(compared_resuts)  # convert our model to a series for easy output
In [22]:
# output and submit to kaggle
In [28]:
# Create an acceptable formula for our machine learning algorithms
formula_ml = 'Survived ~ C(Pclass) + C(Sex) + Age + SibSp + Parch + C(Embarked)'

Support Vector Machines

In [29]:
# set plotting parameters

# create a regression friendly data frame
y, x = dmatrices(formula_ml, data=df, return_type='matrix')

# select which features we would like to analyze
# try chaning the selection here for diffrent output.
# Choose : [2,3] - pretty sweet DBs [3,1] --standard DBs [7,3] -very cool DBs,
# [3,6] -- very long complex dbs, could take over an hour to calculate! 
feature_1 = 2
feature_2 = 3

X = np.asarray(x)
X = X[:,[feature_1, feature_2]]  

y = np.asarray(y)
# needs to be 1 dimenstional so we flatten. it comes out of dmatirces with a shape. 
y = y.flatten()      

n_sample = len(X)

order = np.random.permutation(n_sample)

X = X[order]
y = y[order].astype(np.float)

# do a cross validation
nighty_precent_of_sample = int(.9 * n_sample)
X_train = X[:nighty_precent_of_sample]
y_train = y[:nighty_precent_of_sample]
X_test = X[nighty_precent_of_sample:]
y_test = y[nighty_precent_of_sample:]

# create a list of the types of kerneks we will use for your analysis
types_of_kernels = ['linear', 'rbf', 'poly']

# specify our color map for plotting the results
color_map = plt.cm.RdBu_r

# fit the model
for fig_num, kernel in enumerate(types_of_kernels):
    clf = svm.SVC(kernel=kernel, gamma=3)
    clf.fit(X_train, y_train)

    plt.scatter(X[:, 0], X[:, 1], c=y, zorder=10, cmap=color_map)

    # circle out the test data
    plt.scatter(X_test[:, 0], X_test[:, 1], s=80, facecolors='none', zorder=10)
    x_min = X[:, 0].min()
    x_max = X[:, 0].max()
    y_min = X[:, 1].min()
    y_max = X[:, 1].max()

    XX, YY = np.mgrid[x_min:x_max:200j, y_min:y_max:200j]
    Z = clf.decision_function(np.c_[XX.ravel(), YY.ravel()])

    # put the result into a color plot
    Z = Z.reshape(XX.shape)
    plt.pcolormesh(XX, YY, Z > 0, cmap=color_map)
    plt.contour(XX, YY, Z, colors=['k', 'k', 'k'], linestyles=['--', '-', '--'],
               levels=[-.5, 0, .5])

<matplotlib.figure.Figure at 0x26b036e9f98>

Any value in the blue survived while anyone in the read did not. Checkout the graph for the linear transformation. It created its decision boundary right on 50%! That guess from earlier turned out to be pretty good. As you can see, the remaining decision boundaries are much more complex than our original linear decision boundary. These more complex boundaries may be able to capture more structure in the dataset, if that structure exists, and so might create a more powerful predictive model.

In [30]:
# Here you can output which ever result you would like by changing the Kernel and clf.predict lines
# Change kernel here to poly, rbf or linear
# adjusting the gamma level also changes the degree to which the model is fitted
clf = svm.SVC(kernel='poly', gamma=3).fit(X_train, y_train)                                                            
y,x = dmatrices(formula_ml, data=test_data, return_type='dataframe')

# Change the interger values within x.ix[:,[6,3]].dropna() explore the relationships between other 
# features. the ints are column postions. ie. [6,3] 6th column and the third column are evaluated. 
res_svm = clf.predict(x.ix[:,[6,3]].dropna()) 

res_svm = DataFrame(res_svm,columns=['Survived'])
res_svm.to_csv("svm_poly_63_g10.csv") # saves the results for you, change the name as you please. 

Random Forest

In [32]:
# import the machine learning library that holds the randomforest
import sklearn.ensemble as ske

# Create the random forest model and fit the model to our training data
y, x = dmatrices(formula_ml, data=df, return_type='dataframe')
# RandomForestClassifier expects a 1 demensional NumPy array, so we convert
y = np.asarray(y).ravel()
#instantiate and fit our model
results_rf = ske.RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100).fit(x, y)

# Score the results
score = results_rf.score(x, y)
print ("Mean accuracy of Random Forest Predictions on the data was: {0}".format(score))
Mean accuracy of Random Forest Predictions on the data was: 0.9452247191011236




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *